The South Bay Law Firm Law Blog highlights developing trends in bankruptcy law and practice. Our aim is to provide general commentary on this evolving practice specialty.
 





 
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • March 2014
  • September 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  •  
      RSS
    Comments RSS
    Log in
       
      Insolvency News and Analysis - Week Ending December 5, 2014
    Insolvency News and Analysis - Week Ending November 21, 2014
    Insolvency News and Analysis - Week Ending November 14, 2014
    Insolvency News and Analysis - Week of November 7, 2014
       

    Solvency Analysis in Preference Litigation

    Last week’s post discussed public-market data as the benchmark for solvency in assessing fraudulent transfers.  This week’s post covers solvency the “old fashioned” way – in addressing preference litigation.

    Annual balance sheet of a State-owned farm, dr...
    Image via Wikipedia

     

    Ray Clark, who runs Valcor Consulting – an Irvine-based restructuring, valuation, and litigation consultancy – and who contributes regularly to this blog, recently offered an overview of the solvency analysis and valuation techniques that apply when a company faces claims for payments made within 90 days of a debtor’s bankruptcy:

    The question of solvency in a voidable preference action depends upon the fair valuation of the debtor’s assets at the time of the transfer, along with other solvency analyses.  The question of whether to use a “going concern” valuation analysis versus a “liquidation” analysis depends upon whether the debtor was “on its death bed” at the testing date, e.g. the transfer date.  If the going concern premise is applied, then the BK court typically relies on an appraisal of the business, i.e., the value of the assets used in an ongoing enterprise, as the basis for the solvency analysis.  By contrast, if it is determined that the business was not a going concern at the transfer date, and then an asset-by-asset analysis under a liquidation scenario will be used.  Lastly, solvency can also be judged by whether the debtor is able to pay his debts as they come due.  So, there is essentially a two-pronged definition of insolvency:    

    1. A debtor is insolvent if the sum of the debtor’s debts is greater than all the debtor’s assets, at a fair valuation, or
    2. A debtor who is generally not paying his debts as they become due is presumed to be insolvent.

    Ultimately, stakeholders may rely on a so-called “Solvency Opinion,” which is designed to assess a company’s overall financial condition at a designated time and using a variety of tests determine whether the entity was solvent or insolvent.  The three tests that are typically applied include:

    1. The Balance Sheet Test (with case law references),
    2. The Capital Adequacy Test and
    3. The Cash Flow Test

    Ray’s article disucssing each of these tests is available here.  For further questions, contact mgood@southbaylawfirm.com or rclark@valcoronline.com.

    Enhanced by Zemanta

    Tags: , , ,

    Leave a Reply