A prior post on this blog featured an article highlighting some of the basic principles from Shari’a law which apply to insolvent individuals and businesses.
Another,¬†more recent article explores the intriguing question of what happens when an investment structured according to Shari’a law needs to be restructured in a non-Shari’a forum – such as a United States Bankruptcy Court.¬† The University of Pennsylvania’s Michael J.T. McMillen uses the recent Chapter 11 filing of In re East Cameron Partners, LP as a case study to highlight some of the issues.
According to McMillen:
The issues to be considered [in connection with efforts to introduce Shariah principles into secular bankruptcy and insolvency regimes throughout the world] are legion. Starting at the level of fundamental principle, will the contemplated regime provide for reorganization along the lines of Chapter 11 systems, or will liquidation be the essential thrust of the system?¬† If, in line with international trends, the system will incorporate reorganization concepts and principles, what is the Sharńę Ņah basis for this regime?¬† Even the fundamental questions are daunting.¬† For example, consideration will need to be given to debt rescheduling concepts, debt forgiveness concepts, delayed debt payment concepts, equity conversion concepts, asset sale concepts, and differential equity conceptions.¬† There will have to be consideration of whether voluntary bankruptcies can and will be permissible.¬† And after agreement is reached on the basic nature and parameters of the system, the long road of discovery and elucidation of specific Sharńę Ņah principles will have to be addressed.¬† That undertaking will wind through a great deal of new territory, from the Sharńę Ņah perspective, and will entail a comparative laws analyses, and a systemic comparison, unlike any in history.
The article is available¬†here.